Research
Security News
Threat Actor Exposes Playbook for Exploiting npm to Build Blockchain-Powered Botnets
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.
@pkgjs/parseargs
Advanced tools
Polyfill of util.parseArgs()
util.parseArgs([config])
Stability: 1 - Experimental
config
{Object} Used to provide arguments for parsing and to configure
the parser. config
supports the following properties:
args
{string[]} array of argument strings. Default: process.argv
with execPath
and filename
removed.options
{Object} Used to describe arguments known to the parser.
Keys of options
are the long names of options and values are an
{Object} accepting the following properties:
type
{string} Type of argument, which must be either boolean
or string
.multiple
{boolean} Whether this option can be provided multiple
times. If true
, all values will be collected in an array. If
false
, values for the option are last-wins. Default: false
.short
{string} A single character alias for the option.strict
{boolean} Should an error be thrown when unknown arguments
are encountered, or when arguments are passed that do not match the
type
configured in options
.
Default: true
.allowPositionals
{boolean} Whether this command accepts positional
arguments.
Default: false
if strict
is true
, otherwise true
.tokens
{boolean} Return the parsed tokens. This is useful for extending
the built-in behavior, from adding additional checks through to reprocessing
the tokens in different ways.
Default: false
.Returns: {Object} The parsed command line arguments:
values
{Object} A mapping of parsed option names with their {string}
or {boolean} values.positionals
{string[]} Positional arguments.tokens
{Object[] | undefined} See parseArgs tokens
section. Only returned if config
includes tokens: true
.Provides a higher level API for command-line argument parsing than interacting
with process.argv
directly. Takes a specification for the expected arguments
and returns a structured object with the parsed options and positionals.
import { parseArgs } from 'node:util';
const args = ['-f', '--bar', 'b'];
const options = {
foo: {
type: 'boolean',
short: 'f'
},
bar: {
type: 'string'
}
};
const {
values,
positionals
} = parseArgs({ args, options });
console.log(values, positionals);
// Prints: [Object: null prototype] { foo: true, bar: 'b' } []
const { parseArgs } = require('node:util');
const args = ['-f', '--bar', 'b'];
const options = {
foo: {
type: 'boolean',
short: 'f'
},
bar: {
type: 'string'
}
};
const {
values,
positionals
} = parseArgs({ args, options });
console.log(values, positionals);
// Prints: [Object: null prototype] { foo: true, bar: 'b' } []
util.parseArgs
is experimental and behavior may change. Join the
conversation in pkgjs/parseargs to contribute to the design.
parseArgs
tokens
Detailed parse information is available for adding custom behaviours by
specifying tokens: true
in the configuration.
The returned tokens have properties describing:
kind
{string} One of 'option', 'positional', or 'option-terminator'.index
{number} Index of element in args
containing token. So the
source argument for a token is args[token.index]
.name
{string} Long name of option.rawName
{string} How option used in args, like -f
of --foo
.value
{string | undefined} Option value specified in args.
Undefined for boolean options.inlineValue
{boolean | undefined} Whether option value specified inline,
like --foo=bar
.value
{string} The value of the positional argument in args (i.e. args[index]
).The returned tokens are in the order encountered in the input args. Options
that appear more than once in args produce a token for each use. Short option
groups like -xy
expand to a token for each option. So -xxx
produces
three tokens.
For example to use the returned tokens to add support for a negated option
like --no-color
, the tokens can be reprocessed to change the value stored
for the negated option.
import { parseArgs } from 'node:util';
const options = {
'color': { type: 'boolean' },
'no-color': { type: 'boolean' },
'logfile': { type: 'string' },
'no-logfile': { type: 'boolean' },
};
const { values, tokens } = parseArgs({ options, tokens: true });
// Reprocess the option tokens and overwrite the returned values.
tokens
.filter((token) => token.kind === 'option')
.forEach((token) => {
if (token.name.startsWith('no-')) {
// Store foo:false for --no-foo
const positiveName = token.name.slice(3);
values[positiveName] = false;
delete values[token.name];
} else {
// Resave value so last one wins if both --foo and --no-foo.
values[token.name] = token.value ?? true;
}
});
const color = values.color;
const logfile = values.logfile ?? 'default.log';
console.log({ logfile, color });
const { parseArgs } = require('node:util');
const options = {
'color': { type: 'boolean' },
'no-color': { type: 'boolean' },
'logfile': { type: 'string' },
'no-logfile': { type: 'boolean' },
};
const { values, tokens } = parseArgs({ options, tokens: true });
// Reprocess the option tokens and overwrite the returned values.
tokens
.filter((token) => token.kind === 'option')
.forEach((token) => {
if (token.name.startsWith('no-')) {
// Store foo:false for --no-foo
const positiveName = token.name.slice(3);
values[positiveName] = false;
delete values[token.name];
} else {
// Resave value so last one wins if both --foo and --no-foo.
values[token.name] = token.value ?? true;
}
});
const color = values.color;
const logfile = values.logfile ?? 'default.log';
console.log({ logfile, color });
Example usage showing negated options, and when an option is used multiple ways then last one wins.
$ node negate.js
{ logfile: 'default.log', color: undefined }
$ node negate.js --no-logfile --no-color
{ logfile: false, color: false }
$ node negate.js --logfile=test.log --color
{ logfile: 'test.log', color: true }
$ node negate.js --no-logfile --logfile=test.log --color --no-color
{ logfile: 'test.log', color: false }
util.parseArgs([config])
process.mainArgs
Proposal
It is already possible to build great arg parsing modules on top of what Node.js provides; the prickly API is abstracted away by these modules. Thus, process.parseArgs() is not necessarily intended for library authors; it is intended for developers of simple CLI tools, ad-hoc scripts, deployed Node.js applications, and learning materials.
It is exceedingly difficult to provide an API which would both be friendly to these Node.js users while being extensible enough for libraries to build upon. We chose to prioritize these use cases because these are currently not well-served by Node.js' API.
Node.js | @pkgjs/parseArgs |
---|---|
v18.3.0 | v0.9.1 |
Install dependencies.
npm install
Open the index.js file and start editing!
Test your code by calling parseArgs through our test file
npm test
Any person who wants to contribute to the initiative is welcome! Please first read the Contributing Guide
Additionally, reading the Examples w/ Output
section of this document will be the best way to familiarize yourself with the target expected behavior for parseArgs() once it is fully implemented.
This package was implemented using tape as its test harness.
process.mainArgs
ProposalNote: This can be moved forward independently of the
util.parseArgs()
proposal/work.
process.mainArgs = process.argv.slice(process._exec ? 1 : 2)
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// specify the options that may be used
const options = {
foo: { type: 'string'},
bar: { type: 'boolean' },
};
const args = ['--foo=a', '--bar'];
const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options });
// values = { foo: 'a', bar: true }
// positionals = []
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// type:string & multiple
const options = {
foo: {
type: 'string',
multiple: true,
},
};
const args = ['--foo=a', '--foo', 'b'];
const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options });
// values = { foo: [ 'a', 'b' ] }
// positionals = []
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// shorts
const options = {
foo: {
short: 'f',
type: 'boolean'
},
};
const args = ['-f', 'b'];
const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options, allowPositionals: true });
// values = { foo: true }
// positionals = ['b']
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// unconfigured
const options = {};
const args = ['-f', '--foo=a', '--bar', 'b'];
const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ strict: false, args, options, allowPositionals: true });
// values = { f: true, foo: 'a', bar: true }
// positionals = ['b']
cmd --foo=bar baz
the same as cmd baz --foo=bar
?
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
cmd --help
?
process.exitCode
?
type: path
to call path.resolve()
on the argument.)
--foo=0o22
mean 0, 22, 18, or "0o22"?
"0o22"
--no-foo
coerce to --foo=false
? For all options? Only boolean options?
{values:{'no-foo': true}}
--foo
the same as --foo=true
? Only for known booleans? Only at the end?
true
as a value so it is just another string.FOO=1 cmd
the same as cmd --foo=1
?
--
signal the end of options?
--
included as a positional?
program -- foo
the same as program foo
?
{positionals:['foo']}
--
was present/relevant?
-bar
the same as --bar
?
-bar
is a short option or options, with expansion logic that follows the
Utility Syntax Guidelines in POSIX.1-2017. -bar
expands to -b
, -a
, -r
.---foo
the same as --foo
?
'-foo'
'foo'
-
a positional? ie, bash some-test.sh | tap -
FAQs
Polyfill of future proposal for `util.parseArgs()`
We found that @pkgjs/parseargs demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.
Security News
NVD’s backlog surpasses 20,000 CVEs as analysis slows and NIST announces new system updates to address ongoing delays.
Security News
Research
A malicious npm package disguised as a WhatsApp client is exploiting authentication flows with a remote kill switch to exfiltrate data and destroy files.